This paper is a checklist, not a treatise. It asks whether the accused has shown a specific threat, whether the offence is bailable in substance, and whether the sessions court has already been tried.
The test is function, not letterhead. We collect the statute, the funding, and the monopoly. If those three point at a public duty, a writ may still lie.
Particulars are not decoration. They tell the accused which week, which place, and which act. We use this note when the FIR is a paragraph and the charge is a slogan.
Counsel should not guess. The paper sets out the competing readings and the practical consequence for a mercy petition versus an appeal.
